Compare ZIP 32656 vs 33065
Keystone Heights, FL vs Coral Springs, FL — a detailed side-by-side comparison of demographics, income, housing, education, and employment.
Key Comparison Findings
- 1 33065 (Coral springs) has a $13 higher median household income.
- 2 Homes in 33065 cost 1.9x more than in 32656.
- 3 33065 has a more educated population (31.27% with bachelor's+).
- 4 32656 has a lower unemployment rate (3.78%).
- 5 33065 is more populous with 58,916 residents.
ZIP Code Profiles
32656
Keystone Heights, Florida
- Population
- 15,836
- Median Income
- $74,213
- Home Value
- $231,200
- Median Rent
- $1,089
33065
Coral Springs, Florida
- Population
- 58,916
- Median Income
- $74,226
- Home Value
- $434,100
- Median Rent
- $1,913
Detailed Comparison Table
| Metric | 32656 Keystone Heights | 33065 Coral Springs | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income | |||
| Median Household Income | $74,213 | $74,226 | 0.0% |
| Per Capita Income | $33,696 | $34,417 | -2.1% |
| Housing | |||
| Median Home Value | $231,200 | $434,100 | -46.7% |
| Median Rent | $1,089 | $1,913 | -43.1% |
| Demographics | |||
| Population | 15,836 | 58,916 | -73.1% |
| Median Age | 42.6 | 36.2 | +17.7% |
| Education | |||
| Employment | |||
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8% | 4.0% | -4.5% |
| Other | |||
| Mean Household Income | $89,361 | $95,955 | -6.9% |
| Below Poverty | 14.9% | 10.5% | +41.3% |
| Bachelor's or Higher | 22.4% | 31.3% | -28.4% |
| Owner Occupied | 83.4% | 49.3% | +69.0% |
| Work from Home | 7.6% | 11.7% | -35.3% |
| Avg Commute (min) | N/A | N/A | — |
| Cost of Living Index | 85.8 | 156.8 | -45.3% |
Visual Comparison
Values normalized to a 0–100 scale for visual comparison. Higher is not always better.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIP code 33065 (Coral springs, FL) has a higher median household income of $74,226 compared to $74,213 in 32656 (Keystone heights, FL).
ZIP code 32656 (Keystone heights, FL) has more affordable housing with a median home value of $231,200 compared to $434,100 in 33065.
ZIP code 32656 has a population of 15,836 while 33065 has 58,916 residents, a difference of 43,080 people.