Compare ZIP 92661 vs 94929
Newport Beach, CA vs Dillon Beach, CA — a detailed side-by-side comparison of demographics, income, housing, education, and employment.
Key Comparison Findings
- 1 94929 (Dillon beach) has a $305 higher median household income.
- 2 Homes in 92661 cost 1.2x more than in 94929.
- 3 94929 has a more educated population (72.70% with bachelor's+).
- 4 92661 has a lower unemployment rate (0.00%).
- 5 92661 is more populous with 3,079 residents.
ZIP Code Profiles
92661
Newport Beach, California
- Population
- 3,079
- Median Income
- $209,231
- Home Value
- $2,000,001
- Median Rent
- $2,908
94929
Dillon Beach, California
- Population
- 293
- Median Income
- $209,536
- Home Value
- $1,660,000
- Median Rent
- N/A
Detailed Comparison Table
| Metric | 92661 Newport Beach | 94929 Dillon Beach | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income | |||
| Median Household Income | $209,231 | $209,536 | -0.1% |
| Per Capita Income | $135,686 | $197,978 | -31.5% |
| Housing | |||
| Median Home Value | $2,000,001 | $1,660,000 | +20.5% |
| Median Rent | $2,908 | N/A | — |
| Demographics | |||
| Population | 3,079 | 293 | +950.9% |
| Median Age | 45.5 | 61.1 | -25.5% |
| Education | |||
| Employment | |||
| Unemployment Rate | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Other | |||
| Mean Household Income | $261,816 | $453,250 | -42.2% |
| Below Poverty | 9.9% | 0.0% | — |
| Bachelor's or Higher | 55.7% | 72.7% | -23.3% |
| Owner Occupied | 38.9% | 83.2% | -53.2% |
| Work from Home | 28.4% | 71.9% | -60.6% |
| Avg Commute (min) | N/A | 32.0 | — |
| Cost of Living Index | 525.5 | 395.7 | +32.8% |
Visual Comparison
Values normalized to a 0–100 scale for visual comparison. Higher is not always better.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIP code 94929 (Dillon beach, CA) has a higher median household income of $209,536 compared to $209,231 in 92661 (Newport beach, CA).
ZIP code 94929 (Dillon beach, CA) has more affordable housing with a median home value of $1,660,000 compared to $2,000,001 in 92661.
ZIP code 92661 has a population of 3,079 while 94929 has 293 residents, a difference of 2,786 people.