Compare ZIP 85260 vs 85742
Scottsdale, AZ vs Tucson, AZ — a detailed side-by-side comparison of demographics, income, housing, education, and employment.
Key Comparison Findings
- 1 85742 (Tucson) has a $1,667 higher median household income.
- 2 Homes in 85260 cost 1.9x more than in 85742.
- 3 85260 has a more educated population (59.32% with bachelor's+).
- 4 85260 has a lower unemployment rate (3.36%).
- 5 85260 is more populous with 39,896 residents.
ZIP Code Profiles
85260
Scottsdale, Arizona
- Population
- 39,896
- Median Income
- $97,177
- Home Value
- $698,200
- Median Rent
- $2,132
85742
Tucson, Arizona
- Population
- 31,613
- Median Income
- $98,844
- Home Value
- $368,300
- Median Rent
- $1,702
Detailed Comparison Table
| Metric | 85260 Scottsdale | 85742 Tucson | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income | |||
| Median Household Income | $97,177 | $98,844 | -1.7% |
| Per Capita Income | $71,468 | $52,792 | +35.4% |
| Housing | |||
| Median Home Value | $698,200 | $368,300 | +89.6% |
| Median Rent | $2,132 | $1,702 | +25.3% |
| Demographics | |||
| Population | 39,896 | 31,613 | +26.2% |
| Median Age | 43.6 | 41.6 | +4.8% |
| Education | |||
| Employment | |||
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4% | 5.2% | -35.8% |
| Other | |||
| Mean Household Income | $147,847 | $129,706 | +14.0% |
| Below Poverty | 5.4% | 6.1% | -11.2% |
| Bachelor's or Higher | 59.3% | 43.7% | +35.7% |
| Owner Occupied | 60.0% | 80.6% | -25.6% |
| Work from Home | 33.3% | 22.0% | +51.1% |
| Avg Commute (min) | N/A | N/A | — |
| Cost of Living Index | 220.7 | 135.7 | +62.7% |
Visual Comparison
Values normalized to a 0–100 scale for visual comparison. Higher is not always better.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIP code 85742 (Tucson, AZ) has a higher median household income of $98,844 compared to $97,177 in 85260 (Scottsdale, AZ).
ZIP code 85742 (Tucson, AZ) has more affordable housing with a median home value of $368,300 compared to $698,200 in 85260.
ZIP code 85260 has a population of 39,896 while 85742 has 31,613 residents, a difference of 8,283 people.