Compare ZIP 78064 vs 79351
Pleasanton, TX vs Odonnell, TX — a detailed side-by-side comparison of demographics, income, housing, education, and employment.
Key Comparison Findings
- 1 78064 (Pleasanton) has a $34 higher median household income.
- 2 Homes in 78064 cost 2.2x more than in 79351.
- 3 78064 has a more educated population (20.36% with bachelor's+).
- 4 79351 has a lower unemployment rate (0.81%).
- 5 78064 is more populous with 16,365 residents.
ZIP Code Profiles
78064
Pleasanton, Texas
- Population
- 16,365
- Median Income
- $66,887
- Home Value
- $220,700
- Median Rent
- $1,111
79351
Odonnell, Texas
- Population
- 1,044
- Median Income
- $66,853
- Home Value
- $98,900
- Median Rent
- $658
Detailed Comparison Table
| Metric | 78064 Pleasanton | 79351 Odonnell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income | |||
| Median Household Income | $66,887 | $66,853 | +0.1% |
| Per Capita Income | $28,772 | $41,652 | -30.9% |
| Housing | |||
| Median Home Value | $220,700 | $98,900 | +123.2% |
| Median Rent | $1,111 | $658 | +68.8% |
| Demographics | |||
| Population | 16,365 | 1,044 | +1,467.5% |
| Median Age | 34.5 | 36.5 | -5.5% |
| Education | |||
| Employment | |||
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4% | 0.8% | +442.0% |
| Other | |||
| Mean Household Income | $85,944 | $110,789 | -22.4% |
| Below Poverty | 13.3% | 6.5% | +106.2% |
| Bachelor's or Higher | 20.4% | 8.1% | +151.4% |
| Owner Occupied | 68.9% | 75.3% | -8.5% |
| Work from Home | 7.9% | 2.3% | +249.8% |
| Avg Commute (min) | N/A | N/A | — |
| Cost of Living Index | 84.3 | 43.1 | +95.5% |
Visual Comparison
Values normalized to a 0–100 scale for visual comparison. Higher is not always better.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIP code 78064 (Pleasanton, TX) has a higher median household income of $66,887 compared to $66,853 in 79351 (Odonnell, TX).
ZIP code 79351 (Odonnell, TX) has more affordable housing with a median home value of $98,900 compared to $220,700 in 78064.
ZIP code 78064 has a population of 16,365 while 79351 has 1,044 residents, a difference of 15,321 people.