Compare ZIP 16868 vs 18938
Pine Grove Mills, PA vs New Hope, PA — a detailed side-by-side comparison of demographics, income, housing, education, and employment.
Key Comparison Findings
- 1 18938 (New hope) has a $4,421 higher median household income.
- 2 Homes in 18938 cost 2x more than in 16868.
- 3 18938 has a more educated population (67.80% with bachelor's+).
- 4 16868 has a lower unemployment rate (0.00%).
- 5 18938 is more populous with 13,649 residents.
ZIP Code Profiles
16868
Pine Grove Mills, Pennsylvania
- Population
- 1,050
- Median Income
- $180,412
- Home Value
- $372,900
- Median Rent
- $1,188
18938
New Hope, Pennsylvania
- Population
- 13,649
- Median Income
- $184,833
- Home Value
- $735,600
- Median Rent
- $1,994
Detailed Comparison Table
| Metric | 16868 Pine Grove Mills | 18938 New Hope | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income | |||
| Median Household Income | $180,412 | $184,833 | -2.4% |
| Per Capita Income | $73,013 | $112,380 | -35.0% |
| Housing | |||
| Median Home Value | $372,900 | $735,600 | -49.3% |
| Median Rent | $1,188 | $1,994 | -40.4% |
| Demographics | |||
| Population | 1,050 | 13,649 | -92.3% |
| Median Age | 36.6 | 58.3 | -37.2% |
| Education | |||
| Employment | |||
| Unemployment Rate | 0.0% | 2.9% | -100.0% |
| Other | |||
| Mean Household Income | $177,827 | $245,311 | -27.5% |
| Below Poverty | 0.0% | 2.7% | -100.0% |
| Bachelor's or Higher | 56.3% | 67.8% | -16.9% |
| Owner Occupied | 91.1% | 89.0% | +2.3% |
| Work from Home | 58.7% | 36.7% | +59.7% |
| Avg Commute (min) | N/A | N/A | — |
| Cost of Living Index | 119.5 | 224.1 | -46.7% |
Visual Comparison
Values normalized to a 0–100 scale for visual comparison. Higher is not always better.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIP code 18938 (New hope, PA) has a higher median household income of $184,833 compared to $180,412 in 16868 (Pine Grove Mills, PA).
ZIP code 16868 (Pine Grove Mills, PA) has more affordable housing with a median home value of $372,900 compared to $735,600 in 18938.
ZIP code 16868 has a population of 1,050 while 18938 has 13,649 residents, a difference of 12,599 people.