Compare ZIP 10549 vs 11946
Mount Kisco, NY vs Hampton Bays, NY — a detailed side-by-side comparison of demographics, income, housing, education, and employment.
Key Comparison Findings
- 1 10549 (Mount kisco) has a $70 higher median household income.
- 2 Homes in 11946 cost 1.1x more than in 10549.
- 3 10549 has a more educated population (65.17% with bachelor's+).
- 4 11946 has a lower unemployment rate (3.50%).
- 5 10549 is more populous with 16,135 residents.
ZIP Code Profiles
10549
Mount Kisco, New York
- Population
- 16,135
- Median Income
- $133,988
- Home Value
- $668,000
- Median Rent
- $1,571
11946
Hampton Bays, New York
- Population
- 15,819
- Median Income
- $133,918
- Home Value
- $737,400
- Median Rent
- $2,380
Detailed Comparison Table
| Metric | 10549 Mount Kisco | 11946 Hampton Bays | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income | |||
| Median Household Income | $133,988 | $133,918 | +0.1% |
| Per Capita Income | $80,531 | $69,781 | +15.4% |
| Housing | |||
| Median Home Value | $668,000 | $737,400 | -9.4% |
| Median Rent | $1,571 | $2,380 | -34.0% |
| Demographics | |||
| Population | 16,135 | 15,819 | +2.0% |
| Median Age | 41.6 | 44.1 | -5.7% |
| Education | |||
| Employment | |||
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0% | 3.5% | +41.4% |
| Other | |||
| Mean Household Income | $206,989 | $179,986 | +15.0% |
| Below Poverty | 7.0% | 7.9% | -11.3% |
| Bachelor's or Higher | 65.2% | 47.2% | +38.0% |
| Owner Occupied | 76.8% | 81.9% | -6.2% |
| Work from Home | 28.4% | 9.9% | +187.3% |
| Avg Commute (min) | N/A | N/A | — |
| Cost of Living Index | 195.5 | 237.4 | -17.6% |
Visual Comparison
Values normalized to a 0–100 scale for visual comparison. Higher is not always better.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIP code 10549 (Mount kisco, NY) has a higher median household income of $133,988 compared to $133,918 in 11946 (Hampton bays, NY).
ZIP code 10549 (Mount kisco, NY) has more affordable housing with a median home value of $668,000 compared to $737,400 in 11946.
ZIP code 10549 has a population of 16,135 while 11946 has 15,819 residents, a difference of 316 people.