Compare ZIP 10549 vs 10989
Mount Kisco, NY vs Valley Cottage, NY — a detailed side-by-side comparison of demographics, income, housing, education, and employment.
Key Comparison Findings
- 1 10989 (Valley cottage) has a $279 higher median household income.
- 2 Homes in 10549 cost 1.2x more than in 10989.
- 3 10549 has a more educated population (65.17% with bachelor's+).
- 4 10549 has a lower unemployment rate (4.95%).
- 5 10549 is more populous with 16,135 residents.
ZIP Code Profiles
10549
Mount Kisco, New York
- Population
- 16,135
- Median Income
- $133,988
- Home Value
- $668,000
- Median Rent
- $1,571
10989
Valley Cottage, New York
- Population
- 9,187
- Median Income
- $134,267
- Home Value
- $549,700
- Median Rent
- $2,065
Detailed Comparison Table
| Metric | 10549 Mount Kisco | 10989 Valley Cottage | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income | |||
| Median Household Income | $133,988 | $134,267 | -0.2% |
| Per Capita Income | $80,531 | $64,717 | +24.4% |
| Housing | |||
| Median Home Value | $668,000 | $549,700 | +21.5% |
| Median Rent | $1,571 | $2,065 | -23.9% |
| Demographics | |||
| Population | 16,135 | 9,187 | +75.6% |
| Median Age | 41.6 | 46.8 | -11.1% |
| Education | |||
| Employment | |||
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0% | 9.2% | -46.0% |
| Other | |||
| Mean Household Income | $206,989 | $171,524 | +20.7% |
| Below Poverty | 7.0% | 2.8% | +149.6% |
| Bachelor's or Higher | 65.2% | 58.2% | +12.1% |
| Owner Occupied | 76.8% | 89.4% | -14.1% |
| Work from Home | 28.4% | 17.1% | +66.1% |
| Avg Commute (min) | N/A | N/A | — |
| Cost of Living Index | 195.5 | 186.6 | +4.8% |
Visual Comparison
Values normalized to a 0–100 scale for visual comparison. Higher is not always better.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIP code 10989 (Valley cottage, NY) has a higher median household income of $134,267 compared to $133,988 in 10549 (Mount kisco, NY).
ZIP code 10989 (Valley cottage, NY) has more affordable housing with a median home value of $549,700 compared to $668,000 in 10549.
ZIP code 10549 has a population of 16,135 while 10989 has 9,187 residents, a difference of 6,948 people.