Compare ZIP 06282 vs 06357
Woodstock Valley, CT vs Niantic, CT — a detailed side-by-side comparison of demographics, income, housing, education, and employment.
Key Comparison Findings
- 1 06357 (Niantic) has a $1,246 higher median household income.
- 2 Homes in 06357 cost 1.1x more than in 06282.
- 3 06357 has a more educated population (46.18% with bachelor's+).
- 4 06282 has a lower unemployment rate (0.00%).
- 5 06357 is more populous with 11,332 residents.
ZIP Code Profiles
06282
Woodstock Valley, Connecticut
- Population
- 1,134
- Median Income
- $91,780
- Home Value
- $353,400
- Median Rent
- $1,871
06357
Niantic, Connecticut
- Population
- 11,332
- Median Income
- $93,026
- Home Value
- $397,300
- Median Rent
- $1,429
Detailed Comparison Table
| Metric | 06282 Woodstock Valley | 06357 Niantic | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income | |||
| Median Household Income | $91,780 | $93,026 | -1.3% |
| Per Capita Income | $59,424 | $57,039 | +4.2% |
| Housing | |||
| Median Home Value | $353,400 | $397,300 | -11.0% |
| Median Rent | $1,871 | $1,429 | +30.9% |
| Demographics | |||
| Population | 1,134 | 11,332 | -90.0% |
| Median Age | 61.6 | 55.5 | +11.0% |
| Education | |||
| Employment | |||
| Unemployment Rate | 0.0% | 2.4% | -100.0% |
| Other | |||
| Mean Household Income | $111,593 | $127,109 | -12.2% |
| Below Poverty | 4.2% | 5.5% | -23.4% |
| Bachelor's or Higher | 39.2% | 46.2% | -15.1% |
| Owner Occupied | 82.4% | 76.1% | +8.3% |
| Work from Home | 2.7% | 21.1% | -87.1% |
| Avg Commute (min) | N/A | N/A | — |
| Cost of Living Index | 138.1 | 132.8 | +4.0% |
Visual Comparison
Values normalized to a 0–100 scale for visual comparison. Higher is not always better.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIP code 06357 (Niantic, CT) has a higher median household income of $93,026 compared to $91,780 in 06282 (Woodstock valley, CT).
ZIP code 06282 (Woodstock valley, CT) has more affordable housing with a median home value of $353,400 compared to $397,300 in 06357.
ZIP code 06282 has a population of 1,134 while 06357 has 11,332 residents, a difference of 10,198 people.